Thursday, April 30, 2009

Those hate mongers that poison our blogging community with their agendas.

Beware of this new disease spreading through our blogging community. The infections that they spread is as dangerous to our blogging community as the Swine Flue. In fact some of these hateful people can be described as "Swine". Signs of this new infection can be noticed throughout the blogisphere, and most visible and most notably done to the Conservative/Republican bloggers. The disappearance of anyone with basic common sense, integrity, and morals has been replaced by some type of lower form of life called the " Anonymous Blogger" or the blogger with no blog at all but only a name. For example a name called "Lynne" or "Me" or "IMHO". Left behind is some type of lower life form, with only a vague recollection of what it was like to once have a conscience.
These venomous infected people sit behind their keyboard just looking to make trouble for any Conservative/Republican bloggers. Most are vicious outright lies, ridiculous accusations, and false allegations.. Case in point the recent attact on a most liked and excellect Female blogger who's only crime was/is being a Conservative/Republican blogger. By deliberately spreading lies, and venomous rhetoric and targeting whoever they wish to dispose of.
The technical name of this disease -“The Anonymous Blogger.”
Most use multiple screen names, or just take the easy way and post as "Anonymous"

Their Goal is to spread as many vicious outright lies, ridiculous accusations, and false allegations, as they can, in hopes that if they fling enough of it out there, some of it may stick. It’s a sick and twisted game, by sick and twisted people. Most of these sick and twisted people are of the Liberal persuasion.
There are a small group of screen names like "Just Me", “IMHO”, Truth seekers”, “letmesaythis”, and some new sock puppets, (sock puppets are when one person creates multiple screen names) “Lynne”. How many people this group represents, is unknown. The group is being fueled by a Liberal bunch.

This group has an axe to grind with anyone that does not fit into their agenda. Why? These bloggers are not happy enough to only write about their cause, but they must try to downgrade everyone else by ruining his reputation.

WARNING- if this group of hate-mongers are successful, who will be their next target? YOU? It would be unwise to underestimate the capability of people who are focused on furthering a specific agenda. They are anti law, anti talk radio, anti anyone who maybe pro-life, and pro drugs.
These hate mongers also have legitimate blogs.

Saturday, April 25, 2009



Hey Libs!

Friday, April 24, 2009

Thank You For Your Support

Words cannot express my appreciation of some of you bloggers and your stand against the Leftists. Your actions go a long way to showing the intolerance which pervades the leftist's bloggers and their agenda which is destroying this great country from within.
Its not surprising to see that the Liberal's feel it is better to lie through ones teeth than to be true to ones beliefs.
We are conservative, we hunt, we fish, and we cling to our religion and our guns. The left would rather go to their protests and be Brainwashed and sing Kumbaya, hold hands, cry about how the country is Imperialistic, feel guilty about having parents who make more money than the wino who doesn’t want to do a decent days work for a decent wage, etc.
I’m going to do just like the asswipes on the left did, and call for the Impeachment of the sitting President, who we all can see now is an idiot.

Thursday, April 23, 2009

How to Identify A Liberal Troll

Greetings, Asylum residents! This is important message form the author of this blog..I realize this won't come as much of a surprise to most people, but it is something that MUST be said, even though it's really common knowledge.
Now, what is it that makes liberals so despicable? What is it about these cockroaches that makes normal people's skin crawl? Is it because they're traitors? Is it because they elevate terrorists to the level of "freedom fighters?" Is it because they lack basic hygiene? Actually, no, while all that is true, it's not what I am referring to. .

The worst thing about liberals is that they are all talk.

That's right. Liberals are all talk. They do nothing to help the poor the starving, or the suffering or about the war, but talk about it. They preach peace and harmony, but they ally themselves with terrorists and violent communist regimes such as Cuba and North Korea. Hell, they've now allied themselves with the a-hole's friends like Castro, Hugo Chavez, and Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, all buddies of the Pansy in the White House right now.

They're all for regime change in Iraq, just as long as nobody has to actually DO anything about it. They claim to be for human rights and freedom, but the only action they're willing to take is to slap a "Save Tibet" bumper sticker on the back of their 1975 Volvo.

Since the coronation of Mother Moonbat by the sycophantic leftist media, we have heard nothing but positive coverage that America-hating ass-hole Cindy Sheehan and all those involved in the protests at Camp Crawford. These lunatics have don't nothing but bitch and moan about everything that was good about America.

Now have a good time commenting here, I won't delete your shit like most of you do at YOUR blogs.

Wednesday, April 22, 2009

I wonder how many liberals' lives were saved because we poured some water on a bad guy!

As I wrote on some ones blog today!

Thank God for the so called "Torture"
Waterboarding that we have done.
God only knows how may American lives we have saved by doing what we have done.
Would you have rather cut off their freaken heads?

Personally, I'm OK with torture under these circumstances. Part of the criticism of torturing is that it produces unreliable information, which is not necessarily true. Torturing to elicit a confession is notoriously unreliable and really does nothing to prevent future harm, so it's not right in any circumstances. Torturing to obtain intelligence information about FUTURE acts by OTHER people is more reliable, making it more justifiable. When you also consider the fact that the torture was relatively non-violent and was only used on a VERY small number of high level detainees that we knew almost certainly had useful information about future attacks... I'm sure if it saved the life of ONE of your family members you would think differently!
And don't tell me about the Geneva convention! I know all about it.. I served our county and I'm very familiar with all the rules.
The Geneva convention requires soldiers to wear uniforms. This is designed so that troops know who to shoot at and don't kill a bunch of civilians. If a spy (not wearing a uniform) is captured, he can be interrogated, executed, and anything else they want to do, and this has always been the case, even for civilized countries. Why do you think spies carry cyanide capsules? I'm sick of people pretending otherwise.
Yes, thank you Mr. Bush.

Tuesday, April 14, 2009

The Blogger who calls himself




With a Traumatic Brain Injury. Who is a racist idiot and should not be allowed outside of his cell.

Another example of hypocrisy by liberal skank and wanna-be-intellectual airheads

Friday, April 10, 2009

Somali pirates threaten to kill U.S. Captain

The a-hole Somali pirates holding an American ship captain held hostage have demanded a ransom for him - and threatened to kill him if they are attacked.The ransom demand came hours after Captain Richard Phillips tried to escape by leaping off the pirates' lifeboat and into the sea. But though Capt Phillips was within sight of the U.S. Navy destroyer he was quickly recaptured.
So maybe the FBI 'negotiators' should just tell the pirates that they will send the battleships in and level the entire coast of that gutter country if one hair on the Captains' head is damaged and if that doesn't work, then pick them off with sharpshooters firing in unison..
If this man dies it will be on Obama the Pantywaist's head. Shameful.. Get in some sharpshooters and do the right thing NOW!

Wednesday, April 8, 2009

I don't want a President who "means well." I want a President who defend this country

When are people going to realize that Obama is president of liberal America,not the whole country? A real man would never have humiliated himself on the world stage like Obama did but then again who's ever accused him of being a real man? Of course some people think that a real man expresses his feelings but you have to draw the line at being a snivillng wiener.You would never this behavior by a real black man.
I’m not interested in reaching out to people that want to slice my head off and take pictures of it. Does that sound vulgar? Maybe. But quite frankly I don’t eve see the so called moderate Muslims reaching out to my country.
I don't want a President who "means well." I want a President who defend this country, uphold the Constitution and represent as best as possible all (legitimate) interests of Americans and not foreign governments or their citizens

The Obama we knew before, or didn't care!

If we choose to blame the press for not vetting Obama, then we ought to ask ourselves why “we the people” didn’t demand more. Either one of two answers is possible, and neither offers much hope for the future.

We either knew who and what Obama was and represents, or we simply didn’t care. We either looked deep into his past and saw a socialist/pacifist/delusional narcissist, who had no scruples and standards whatsoever and said “he’s the one”, or he simply made us feel good with the narcotic of “hope and change” and we just wanted a temporary high to relieve us the pains of our current existence.

It is impossible that any thinking person can honestly believe that borrowing/printing and spending upwards of 10 - 15 trillion dollars is anything but a major catastrophe in the making. Yet the public, save a relatively small cadre of tea party attendees, is inattentive, perhaps by choice.

That there was not national outrage over the bow to the Saudi king probably says more than anything else. There has never been, at least as far as I can recall, such a disgraceful, disgusting, and dishonorable act by a US president. By former presidents, yeah, Carter certainly has done his share, but not by a sitting president.

Sunday, April 5, 2009

Barack takes a Bow

In a shocking display of fealty to a foreign potentate, President Obama bowed to Saudi King Abdullah at the Group of 20 summit in London last week. The bow was an extraordinary protocol violation. Such an act is a traditional obeisance befitting a king's subjects, not his peer. There is no precedent for U.S. presidents bowing to Saudi or any other royals.
He has sent many signals to the Muslims. Remember when he talked about his Muslim faith, and didn't even realize he had a "slip of the tongue"?
He intends to ruin this country so that Islam can conquer the rest of the world